a noteworthy conversation…
Over on Greg Sterling’s blog, industry vet Marty Himmelstein provides a nicely articulated perspective on the implications of the lack of effective business content in Local Search. Even more interesting is the comment conversation that the blog post triggers. A worthwhile read, all the way through the comments. The role and merits of SEO are challenged and defended by some of the more astute local SEO practitioners.
An excerpt of my comments are copied below, to hopefully whet your appetite. Join the conversation on Greg’s site, it’s a quality debate.
…In particular, I think you capture the essence of why web search is struggling with relevance models for local content, and why user-based content forms the most practical proxy for link logic in Local.
I would add that, IMHO, the task of Local Search, particularly for service based businesses, is to winnow down to a short list. I believe it is fundamentally impractical to collect sufficient decision-making content to go from a short-list to a definitive selection. To me, this is where a new generation of conversational and contextual technologies kick in. The consumer wil invariably - as you point out - do their ultimate selection on a range of personal factors. Scheduling convenience and negotiated pricing may be capable of being automated, but not by “the masses” for a very long time. Consumers may also be aided by video tools, in assessing whether they want a specific service person into their house, but again, this is an exception not the rule.
The final mile of Local Search, where a short list converts into a selection/transaction remains one of the most interesting unsolved problems.
Finally, I’d add that one other dimension of local search - wherein consumers purchase patterns are driven by special offers - is another fascinating unsolved piece of the puzzle. Google’s current lame foray into coupon aggregation and display is not even close to addressing the opportunity….
February 8th, 2009 at 11:35 am
Thanks, Perry, for pointing out my blog post and the ensuing conversation.
I couldn’t agree more that the job of local search is to winnow results down to a short list. One reason why is that sometimes a user’s final decision on the business he will engage will be based on offline activity, such as getting a price quote, personal interaction, asking the kids what they’re in the mood for, and so forth. As you allude to, one of the most interesting aspects of local search is the interplay between online and offline activity. Trying to get the online or automated part of local search (and software in general) to do too much is a fruitless endeavor. The best systems will know that some things are ‘above their pay grade.’
Marty